Thats O for

A video that makes me want to know how may takes it was done in to get a true representation of the levels of awesome..

Random stuff has moved..

No i'm not dead, yet. As part of getting this blog back up and running I have moved all the wonderful random stuff to here (there's even a new post !) . This blog will be solely tech from now on (and maybe music).

Youtube "We're sorry, this video is no longer available" fix finally found

I have had a problem on my laptop were alot (8/10) videos from Youtube, embedded or on the site directly would come up with the dreaded "We're sorry, this video is no longer available" error. It was most frustrating because it obvious that the video was still available and the error occurred in Firefox, Chrome and IE while my gaming rig would connect without any problems.

Error would still occur after I cleared the cache on all browsers, ran CCleaner and rebooted.
I updated my flash to what was then a beta version and updated again when it was released (10,0,12,36), still no joy.

Here are couple of fixes that I found online :

Turn off Google Web Accelerator , this is a caching proxy that will supposedly speed up your browsing from google. Not relevant to me as I've never had it installed.

Uncheck "Automatically Detect Settings" in Internet Properties/Connections/Lan settings . Again not relevant as I have this turned off from the start for every Windows install I do.

So today I finally had enough. After diagnosing the problem using Tcpview , I noticed that the page load from youtube had a lot of unconnected end points, this immediately made me realise I had applied the tcpipsys-hard-limit-removal patch to my gaming / server pc, but not my laptop. A quick stop at half-open.com , install and reboot and the problem is history :)

Please leave comments if this does or does not work for you.

Windows wont eject USB device.

I have an XP laptop that has some funky USB driver action going on and refuses to let me "Safely Remove" some devices; also my Vista desktop has a powered USB hub that refuses to eject anything at all so I went looking for a USB manager and found USBDeview.

Its a portable (ie no install) application that will show you every USB device installed on your system and its current state.

This gives you full control of your USB functions, like allowing you to uninstall any USB device even if its not plugged in or won't register on insertion and to properly eject most devices cleanly.
Usbdeview also has the ability to autorun any file on device insertion (like Antivirus scan etc) and has command line switches available. Tested on XP 32 and Vista x64, worked perfectly and did I mention its free ?

If you are still having problems getting your OS to let go of a device you can use Process Explorer to find out what process has hold of it.

Process Explorer has a huge amount of information about your running system and makes an excellent task manager replacement on all Windows platforms.
To find that allusive process : Open Process Explorer and go to the Find menu. Type in the name of the device (which you can get from the USBDeview description) and it will show all the processes that have it open, I have used my Xbox 360 controller as an example in the picture below.

As you can see the application XboxStat.exe has the controller open, if I double click it it will take me to its place in the process tree were I can end task it if I want. Be careful what you close, if you have to close explorer you will lose your taskbar and any explorer windows that are open. If explorer doesn't start back up automatically go to Process Explorer / File / Run and type explorer
Hit enter and your shell should come back.

How to and why to create a RAM Disk

A RAM disk is a section of system memory that is sectioned off and treated as a hard drive. This has several benefits due to the speed of RAM being exponentially faster then any hard drive, and no physical moving parts, so no wear and tear on your disk from high throughput applications or scripts.

I started looking around for information after reading about putting your Firefox cache onto a ram disk to improve speed. After a couple of hours I have found the following for Windows, Linux and MacOsX.

Windows : I tried several different home brew options and noted that most of the solutions were based off of the W2k resource kit drivers which means no vista support. Finally I found DataRAM , grab the top download (Dataram RAMDisk Beta - Windows Vista, XP, Server) which is in public beta at the moment, its free and supports up to 4gb disks which is probably overkill for most users but allows for the intriguing possibility of loading a game into the RAMdisk to increase level load times etc.

The best feature of Dataram is the ability to save and load disk images, this allows you to save the content of the ramdisk and load it again on startup. There is also a auto save option which I havn't tested but could be very handy.
The best way to create the image, I have found, is in the settings tab set the size ( Dataram wont let you set more then half your RAM as a disk for obvious reasons ), select either FAT16, FAT32 or unformatted if you want an NTFS disk (You will have to go through the Computer Management tool found in the Administrator Tools menu once the driver is running and you will see an unformatted disk, format it as NTFS.)

Now go to the Load and Save tab and select Save image at shutdown, enter the location and file name to be used and select Save Image now. Copy the File name to the Load image settings section and select Load disk image at startup. Now stop the RAMdisk, depending on your OS you may have to actually restart windows to unload the driver.
If you had to restart the OS go back into the Dataram app and manually select Start. Once the driver is running it will automatically resume on OS startup.

Now you have a persistent RAM disk, awesome.

Linux : Here is a good article on RAM disk creation for kernel 2.4 and greater. When I get my Linux/Hackintosh box set-up i'll do some investigation into making a persistent image.

MacOsX : Here is a cool little GUI utility for creating RAM disks for OsX 10.4 and later, again no persistence yet, see previous comment.

While testing FireFox, I first just copied the entire FireFox folder from Program files\Mozilla Firefox onto the RAM disk and pointed the FireFox cache at it, this improved the load, shutdown and page load speed, I have since just left the cache on the RAMdisk as I leave my laptop turned on all the time anyway.

To change the Firefox cache location, do the following :

Type about:config into the firefox address bar, you will get a warning about dragons (!). If your brave enough to continue you will then see a list of all the inbuilt preferences inside FF. First we change the location of the cache, put browser.cache.disk.parent_directory into the search bar, double click the found entry and change the setting to your newly created RAMdisk, in my case G:\
I set my ram disk at 55mb, so now I want to make sure the cache doesn't exceed that size. To do this we have to create a new entry as its normally hidden, right click anywhere in the about:config page and select New, then Integer, copy and paste this browser.cache.memory.capacity

Now I give it a value of 50000 for 50mb.

My settings now look like this :



That's it, close the about:config page and restart FireFox, check the RAMdisk and it will now have a Cache folder.

X58 + CoreI7 + tripple channel shiz ?

Is it really worth it to go for the X58 + CoreI7 + tripple channel shiz ?

Ans : a big NO. For several reasons.

1. It looks good on paper spec-wise. Real comparison benchmark tests showed improved numbers. But the most important question being "do you actually feel any significant improvement to system responsiveness/fluidity during daily use?" is not met.

2. on 32-bit operating systems and software, the max memory used is around 3.5GB, and anything more is just not used. So stick with a dual channel system. 4 slots with 1Gb sticks or 2 slots of 2GB sticks.

3. Theoretically, to see any advantage of the this type of system over a dual channel system, one should logically use 64-bit OS (and to use at least 6GB ie 3 x 2GB sticks) *and* to use 64-bit software as well. But there simply is just not enough 64-bit software out there (and certainly not cheap too).

4. At present, prices of tripple kits, CoreI7 CPUs, X58 mainboards are expensive. But that is not the key point. The key point is that the performance-price ratio is just too poor right now. And don't every think like this : "ok, so I'll get myself the mainboard and CPU now, and then when prices come down - get the memory". Because by the time prices of tripple kits come down , so will have prices of the mainboard and CPU, and one would be kicking oneself in the teeth to have paid "exorbitantly" for the then mainboard when there is a new-release feature-rich mainboard X58-derivative at a lower price, thanks to technology turnover or refinement.

I'm hardware-hardcore. Not rich and stupid. There's a difference.

Please welcome..

Our new team member Rolex. He has many years IT experiance within the industry and im sure will have some interesting stuff to share...